By Dylan Wiliam
Why I wrote my new book
My latest book, written with Siobhán Leahy, is designed specifically to help individual teachers who want to develop their practice of formative assessment on their own or with small groups of colleagues. In this blog, I provide some suggestions for practical techniques you can try in your classroom right now. Next month, I’ll focus on tips and strategies for how you can work with others to gain support for the difficult work of changing practice.
Technique 1: Start with samples of work, rather than rubrics, to communicate quality
As an adult in the professional world, if someone were to ask you to write a business plan or create a product brochure and the task was somewhat unfamiliar to you, what’s the first thing you might do to get help? Perhaps you would search the Internet for examples of business plans or product brochures that other professionals have created.
As you examine these examples, you might be able to pick out the high-quality vs. low-quality ones, and even identify why you think this is so. Viewing samples of work in this way can help you as you create your own piece of work and, hopefully, result in a higher-quality product than if you had just started from scratch.
While rubrics have a role to play in your classroom, we believe they are best regarded as the culmination of a developmental process that begins with examination of samples of students’ work. So, before your students do a laboratory report, before they write a ghost story, spend some time getting them to look at other students’ attempts at similar tasks.
Some teachers believe that it is wasteful to take time that students could be generating their own work to look at the work of others, but there are two immediate benefits of getting students to look at samples of student work. First, we are all better at spotting mistakes in the work of others than we are in our own work. Second, when we notice mistakes in the work of others, we are less likely to make the same mistakes in our own work.
Technique 2: No hands up, except to ask a question
Walk into a classroom almost anywhere in the world, and you will see the same script being played out. The teacher asks a question, and a number of students raise their hands to signal they wish to respond. Then, the teacher almost always selects one of the students with his or her hand raised, and that student responds to the question.
But if the aim of questioning is to help the teacher find out what the students know, it makes little sense to select a respondent from the volunteers, because generally, students only raise their hands when they are confident they have the correct answer. Instead, if the teacher is asking the question, students should be given time to think about the question, and then it should be the teacher who selects the student or students to respond, at random.
Technique 3: Focus on the reaction of the students—not the feedback
The only thing that matters with feedback is the reaction of the recipient. That’s it. Feedback, no matter how well designed, that is not acted upon by the student is a waste of time.
This may seem obvious, but hundreds of researchers have ignored this basic truth, and have tried instead to find out whether feedback should be immediate or delayed. Should it be specific or general? Should it be verbal or written? Ultimately, it just comes down to the simple truth that the most effective feedback is just feedback that our students actually use in improving their own learning.
DOWNLOAD MY HANDOUT: 10 Feedback Techniques That Make Students Think
Technique 4: Peer feedback—two stars and a wish
Group students into pairs. When students are giving feedback to each other, they identify two features of the work that are positive (the “stars”) and one suggestion for how the work could be improved (the “wish”). What teachers typically find is that students are much tougher on each other than the teacher would feel able to be, because the power relationships are different.
This is an important observation, since it suggests that, done appropriately, peer feedback may be more effective than teacher feedback, because students are more likely to act on feedback from their peers than they would on feedback from a teacher.
Technique 5: Make self-reports consequential
Provide each student with three colored paper or plastic cups (red, yellow, and green). At the beginning of the lesson, nest the cups so that the green cup is showing. Tell students they can display their yellow cup to signal that the lesson is going too fast or their red cup to stop the lesson in order to ask a question. Accountability is built in by the fact that as soon as one student shows a red cup, the teacher selects another student at random from among those showing green cups, and that student is expected to answer the question being posed by the student who showed the red cup.
If you liked reading about embedding formative assessment into your classroom practice, be sure to sign up for my monthly newsletter. You can also pre-order my new book here. Next month, I’ll post about how you can work with others to gain support for the difficult work of changing practice to make greater use of classroom formative assessment.
Ellie: two thoughts oruecrcd to me as I read your comment. First, your experience of finding that some of these ideas are easier to implement with top-sets is very common, but formative assessment is even more important with the bottom sets. We have to think about why they are saying they do understand when they clearly don’t, and that is where the work of Carol Dweck is so important. She points out that for some (most?) students it is more important to be right than to learn. These are the students who love being given easy work, because they can get it right, and feed their sense of well-being. Other students hate being given easy work, because they know that it is not going to make them any smarter. We have to get students to believe that working hard in mathematics classrooms makes you smarter at mathematics; then we might see bottom set students beginning to focus on growth, rather than well-being.As for lollipop sticks, I think it is absolutely essential that you ask the question first, and then pick the student. If you do it the other way round, first, all the other students can relax, and second, you will probably merely replicate your existing expectations of the student. By all means allow the class to do a think-pair-share after you have asked the question, but then pick a student at random to respond, even if it is only to report what she or he talked about.
Is it ok to share your resource, 10 Feedback Techniques That Make Students Think, with other teachers. I am concerned about copyright.